<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s complicated. It&#8217;s dead. Why use Google+?</title>
	<atom:link href="https://piccana.co.uk/its-complicated-its-dead-why-use-google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://piccana.co.uk/its-complicated-its-dead-why-use-google/</link>
	<description>Inbound Marketing Bolton</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2015 16:27:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MatijaZ</title>
		<link>https://piccana.co.uk/its-complicated-its-dead-why-use-google/#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MatijaZ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2015 09:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://piccana.co.uk/?p=1737#comment-131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hmm... I am not sure if there is directly positive effect on search rankings if posting on g+. Indexing yes, ranking - not sure. If that would be the case, G+ would already be floaded with backlinks and spammers. And this is what G fights against. Regars, Matija]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm&#8230; I am not sure if there is directly positive effect on search rankings if posting on g+. Indexing yes, ranking &#8211; not sure. If that would be the case, G+ would already be floaded with backlinks and spammers. And this is what G fights against. Regars, Matija</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
